Generator–Grid Dynamics Studio
One operating point · stability, controls, flexibility, harmonics and grid code
PLANTPWR1000 MW G GSUX=0.24 pu PCC Q COMP0 MVAr BESS0 MW GRID P 800 MW · Q 80 MVAr
Transient stability
ready
Rotor angle δ
—
initial
Critical clearing
—
classical SMIB
Equal-area margin
—
pu·rad
Outcome
—
—
Time response
P–δequal area
PhasorsV · I · E′
P–Q capability—
Detailed transient
—
—
Dominant mode
—
Hz
Damping ratio ζ
—
—
Terminal voltage
—
pu
Detailed dynamic response
Eigenvalue planelinearized at operating point
Controller chainAVR · GOV · PSS
—
Eigenvalues are obtained from a numerical Jacobian of the same nonlinear equations at the pre-fault equilibrium.
Active machines
—
2–4
Disturbance transient
—
—
Critical mode
—
—
Damping ratio ζ
—
—
Minimum monitored voltage
—
Ifault,peak — pu
Voltage recovery
—
s after clearing
Frequency nadir
—
—
Reactive-current peak
—
—
Editable network · click a line to select the contingencyY-bus
Relative rotor angles after N−1—
Bus voltages / FRT envelope—
Frequency responseCOI
Reactive-current responseΔIq
Post-contingency eigenmodesδ · Δω
Critical mode shape—
Electromechanical modescoherent groups
Batch N−1 screeningnot run
Run the batch study to rank every in-service branch contingency.
Upward reserve
—
MW
Downward reserve
—
MW
90% response
—
s
Sustain
—
—
Fast-resource → plant handover—
Flexibility envelopeΔP · response · sustain
Resonance peak
—
Hz
Peak |Z|
—
Ω
THDᵥ
—
%
Nearest harmonic
—
—
Driving-point impedance scan|Z(f)|
Resulting harmonic voltageh = 5, 7, 11, 13
Evaluated
—
requirements
PASS
—
—
FAIL
—
—
Unsupported
—
not evaluated
Capability vs requirementexample